complex is not available on all platforms. Furthermore, it is trivial to
rewrite complex number expressions to real arithmetic, and in fact
sometimes advantageous for performance reasons: by wrapping as a complex,
one forces a particular Cartesian representation that is not necessarily optimal for the purpose.
Configure dependencies also removed, and aemphasis is now available across
all platforms.
Reviewed-by: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
Instead of calling the input filter request_frame() method,
ff_request_frame() now marks the link and returns immediately.
buffersink is changed to activate the marked filters until
a frame is obtained.
The status field can carry any error code instead of just EOF.
Also only update it through a wrapper function and provide a timestamp.
Update the few filters that used it directly.
Applications are not supposed to mess with links,
they should close the sinks.
Furthermore, this function does not distinguish what end
of the link caused the close and does not have a timestamp.
This field is used for fast comparison between link ages,
it is in AV_TIME_BASE units, in other words microseconds,
µs =~ us.
Renaming it allows a second field in link time base units.
lrint avoids an implicit cast, and is not slower on non-broken libm's. Thus this
represents a Pareto improvement.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
lrint is faster here on -ftree-vectorize with GCC. This is likely simply
an artifact of GCC's rather terrible auto-vectorizer, since as per the
instruction set manuals cvtsd2si and cvttsd2si (or their vector equivalents)
have identical cycle timings.
Anyway, regardless of above, lrint is superior to round accuracy wise.
Safety guaranteed as long int has at least 32 bits.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
lrint is at least as fast, and is more accurate.
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
lrint is at least as fast, and more accurate.
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
lrint is faster and conveys the intent better here. It is safe as long int has
at least 32 bits.
Reviewed-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
In the code we keep using logo_x2-1 and logo_y2-1 rather than logo_x2
and logo_y2 themselves. Define them to be what we need instead, to avoid
the repeated subtractions.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
