fix some smallities.

93.md

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ NSON
 
 ### Preamble
 
-Some [benchmarks](https://github.com/fiatjaf/nostr-json-benchmarks/tree/2f254fff91b3ad063ef9726bb4a3d25316cf12d8) made using all libraries available on Golang show that JSON decoding is very slow. And even when people do assembly-level optimizations things only improve up to a point (e.g. for decoding a Nostr event, the decoding time is 50% smaller).
+Some [benchmarks](https://github.com/fiatjaf/nostr-json-benchmarks/tree/2f254fff91b3ad063ef9726bb4a3d25316cf12d8) made using all libraries available on Golang show that JSON decoding is very slow. And even when people do assembly-level optimizations things only improve up to a point (e.g. for decoding a Nostr event, the "Sonic" library uses about 50% of that of the standard library).
 
-Meanwhile, doing a simple TLV encoding reduces the decoding time to 35% and a simpler static binary format for Nostr events reduces makes that number drop to 4%. However, it would be bad for Nostr if a binary encoding was introduced, as it would be likely to cause compatibility issues, centralize the protocol and/or increase the work for everybody, more about this at [this comment](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/512#issuecomment-1542368664).
+Meanwhile, doing a simple TLV encoding reduces the decoding time to 35% and a simpler static binary format for Nostr events makes that number drop to 4%. However, it would be bad for Nostr if a binary encoding was introduced, as it would be likely to cause compatibility issues, centralize the protocol and/or increase the work for everybody, more about this in [this comment](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/512#issuecomment-1542368664).
 
 ### The actual NIP
 
@@ -20,31 +20,27 @@ Here's an example of a NSON-encoded Nostr event:
 
 `{"id":"57ff66490a6a2af3992accc26ae95f3f60c6e5f84ed0ddf6f59c534d3920d3d2","pubkey":"79be667ef9dcbbac55a06295ce870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798","sig":"504d142aed7fa7e0f6dab5bcd7eed63963b0277a8e11bbcb03b94531beb4b95a12f1438668b02746bd5362161bc782068e6b71494060975414e793f9e19f57ea","created_at":1683762317,"nson":"2801000b0203000100400005040001004000000014","kind":1,"content":"hello world","tags":[["e","b6de44a9dd47d1c000f795ea0453046914f44ba7d5e369608b04867a575ea83e","reply"],["p","c26f7b252cea77a5b94f42b1a4771021be07d4df766407e47738605f7e3ab774","","wss://relay.damus.io"]]}`
 
-The idea is that `"id"` comes first, so it can be accessed by reading a slice of the string from character `7` to character `71`, `pubkey` from character `83` to `147` and so on. `"content"`, `"kind"` and `"tags"` have dynamic sizes, so these are given by the values inside the `"nson"` field (which is also dynamic, its size by its first byte).
+The idea is that `"id"` comes first, so it can be accessed by reading a slice of the string from character `7` to character `71`, `pubkey` from character `83` to `147` and so on. `"content"`, `"kind"` and `"tags"` have dynamic sizes, so their sizes are given by the values inside the `"nson"` field (which is also dynamic, its size given by its first byte).
 
 ### Anatomy of the `"nson"` field
 
-It is hex-encoded. Some fields are a single byte, others are two bytes (4 characters).
+It is hex-encoded. Some fields are a single byte, others are two bytes (4 characters), big-endian.
 
-Each explanation starts at the same line as the field it is referring to.
+                    tt: number of tags (let's say it's two)
-
+                      nn: number of items on the first tag (let's say it's 3)
-                    number of tags (let's say it's two)
+                        1111: number of chars on the first item
-                      number of items on the first tag (let's say it's three)
+                            2222: number of chars on the second item
-                        number of chars on the first item
+                                3333: number of chars on the third item
-                            number of chars on the second item
+                                    nn: number of items on the second tag (let's say it's 2)
-                                number of chars on the third item
+                                      1111: number of chars on the first item
-                                    number of items on the second tag (let's say it's two)
+                                          2222: number of chars on the second item
-                                      number of chars on the first item
-                                          number of chars on the second item
     "nson":"xxkkccccttnn111122223333nn11112222"
-            nson size
+            xx: nson size
-              kind chars
+              kk: kind chars
-                content chars
+                cccc: content chars
 
 ### Reference implementation
 
-Beware, all Rust maniacs, the following reference implementation is written in Go:
-
 ```go
 func decodeNson(data string) *Event {
 	evt := &Event{}
@@ -167,13 +163,13 @@ func encodeNson(evt *Event) string {
 Besides the field ordering and the presence of the `"nson"` field, other restrictions must be applied:
 
 - the `"created_at"` field must have 10, characters, which gives us a range of dates from about 20 years ago up to 250 years in the future.
-- to simplify decoding of `"content"` and `"tags"` strings, escape codes like `\uXXXX` are forbidden in NSON, UTF-8 must be used instead. Only `\n`, `\\` and `\"` are the only valid escaped sequences.
+- to simplify decoding of `"content"` and `"tags"` strings, escape codes like `\uXXXX` are forbidden in NSON, UTF-8 must be used instead. `\n`, `\\` and `\"` are the only valid escaped sequences.
 
 ### Backwards-compatibility
 
-Any reader who is not aware of the NSON-encoding can receive these events and decode them using whatever other JSON decoder they happen to have in hand. The `"nson"` field will just be ignored and life will continue as normal.
+Any reader who is not aware of the NSON-encoding can receive these events and decode them using whatever means they want. The `"nson"` field will just be ignored and life will continue as normal.
 
-Also, other event fields that may be present (for example, the NIP-03 `"ots"` field) can be added at the end, after `"tags"`, with no loss.
+Also, other event fields that may be present (for example, the NIP-03 `"ots"` field) can be added at the end, after `"tags"`, with no loss to anyone.
 
 ### Other points worth mentioning